Jeff Holley
Richard Simpson
ENGL 342
Reflection
Nanook of the North
If Robert Flaherty was the "father of documentary and cinematic ethnography" (Rony, 100), it's not hard to see why, with his poised and extroverted nature of framing work in a way that was fun for both the viewer and those he was filming. Flaherty might not have initially chosen to follow his father's footsteps as a mining engineer. Still, his career was reminiscent of exploring his father's job, who often took his son with him while searching for ore (Barnouw, 33). Naturally, the knowledge he gained as a child led him to evolve into his later profession as a filmmaker because of this background. Still, Flaherty was "a man of intense charm" (Barnouw, 39), which undoubtedly gave him more incredible opportunity to have the relationship he had with the culture he was immersed in.
The film took years to make, probably because it had never been done before. The "happy to lucky" attitudes of the Inuit Itivimuit Tribe, and primarily the "cuddly primitive man" known as Nanook and his immediate family (Barnouw, 35) became the purpose of the film. This film celebrated the life, the struggle, the harshness of the unforgiving nature of how this small group of Inuit who lived and showed to the world something never before seen. They took to the camera well, were aware of being filmed, and allowed for each activity patiently to assist in getting the shot.
Whether it was navigating sea ice in a kayak with the entire family, as we see at the beginning of the film, each one exiting the boat one by one like magic. This scene, leaving the kayak, even included the dog all one by one going the top hole like a magician pulling a rabbit out of it. Another scene Flaherty filmed when cutting an ice window to allow sunlight in the igloo, that took an hour to build, a fantastic feat in such a harsh environment was also incredible to watch.
I was sad to learn his second film, "Moana" with the Somoan's, that took a different approach to what the Polynesians then had encountered with missionaries and traders, by filming them with their traditional "siagos" instead of their "white man clothes" (Barnouw, 45). Unfortunately, that film was a "box office failure" (Barnouw, 48), and his career as a filmmaker gradually ended a decade after his "popular culture" phenomenon (Barnouw, 51).
This was a good overview of Flaherty's career and films. I like your comparison to the magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat. It reminded me a lot of a clown car. You're right though Flaherty did provide the world a window into a world they'd never seen before. I just wonder if in things like the kayak scene it makes the film too staged?
ReplyDeleteGreat work placing Flaherty's biography and subsequent film practice into historical context here--by doing so we get a sense of the creativity and experimental nature of this film. It is interesting to consider the relationship between fictive and reenacted qualities of the film and the non-fictive realities of the environment. Your post invites a connection to Kracauer's argument regarding what he believed to be the "cinematic approach." Does Flaherty in this film coincide with what Kracauer is calling for? Why or why not?
ReplyDelete